{"id":13926,"date":"2022-09-28T00:00:18","date_gmt":"2022-09-28T04:00:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thatwhitepaperguy.com\/?p=13926"},"modified":"2023-02-25T23:09:33","modified_gmt":"2023-02-26T04:09:33","slug":"white-paper-world-9-september-28-2022","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thatwhitepaperguy.com\/white-paper-world-9-september-28-2022\/","title":{"rendered":"White Paper World 9: September 28, 2022"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/p>\n
AP Style<\/em> and all the major writing guides say to spell out numbers up to nine when you’re writing copy or content, right?<\/p>\n But you really should break this rule when naming a numbered list (listicle).<\/p>\n Here’s why.<\/p>\n Consider two white papers, called:<\/p>\n \u2014Three Secrets of SEO You Must Understand<\/em><\/p>\n \u20143 Secrets of SEO You Must Understand<\/em><\/p>\n The first title follows the recommended style, so it’s more proper, right?<\/p>\n Yes, but… it will appear lower in any search results.<\/p>\n That’s because computers sort numbers before letters. They’re programmed to do it that way.<\/p>\n Try it yourself: Sort your files in any folder with any software. Any file name that starts with a numeral will percolate to the top of the list.<\/p>\n Or see this report<\/a>\u00a0from the National Information Standards Organization:<\/p>\n Headings beginning with numbers written in Arabic numerals should be sorted in ascending arithmetical order before<\/strong> headings beginning with a letter sequence. (p.8)<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n That means in any list of search results, our two titles will show up in this order:<\/p>\n \u20143 Secrets of SEO You Must Understand<\/em><\/p>\n \u2014Three Secrets of SEO You Must Understand<\/em><\/p>\n The second might even be pushed way down to page 3 or 4. That’s not where you want it, right?<\/p>\n Start the title of any numbered-list white paper with a numeral from now on: 3 Things, 4 Myths, 5 Hidden Gotchas, 6 Ways, 7 Strategies, and so on.<\/p>\n This one correction will push your paper up ahead of all the rest that follow that pesky style rule that was set down before computers were invented.<\/p>\n Being on top is as easy as 1-2-3.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n I never studied rhetoric in school. I never cared about it in my work.<\/p>\n And I never understood how much I was missing.<\/p>\n Until I realized that rhetoric means persuading an audience using words. Sounds exactly like writing content, doesn’t it?<\/p>\n Today I study rhetoric as a fun and useful hobby. And I think every other writer should learn more about it too.<\/p>\n This new article gives five reasons why… all the way from becoming a better writer to becoming a better person!<\/p>\n Read on to discover those reasons<\/span><\/a>…<\/p>\n From time to time, I’ll be reviewing lively books on rhetoric. In fact, see the very next item.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n When copywriter Steve Maurer<\/strong><\/a> told me about his favorite book on rhetoric, I ordered it immediately.<\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\n <\/p>\n And when I dipped into it, I agreed with him. Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric<\/strong><\/em><\/a> is a treat.<\/p>\n It was written by Ward Farnsworth, a law professor at the University of Texas.<\/p>\n The book has three main parts:<\/p>\n \u2022\u00a0Repetition of words and phrases In each part, the author gathered together hundreds of examples from well-spoken British, Irish, and American writers and leaders.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n You will encounter\u00a0the American founding fathers,<\/strong> Burke<\/strong>, Churchill<\/strong>, Dickens<\/strong>, Lincoln<\/strong>, Melville<\/strong>, Shaw<\/strong>, plus countless others.<\/p>\n All told, the book includes more than 1,000 examples of different rhetorical devices, thoughtfully arranged in a helpful order.<\/p>\n The earliest examples, starting from around 1600, draw from Shakespeare<\/strong> and the King James Bible<\/strong>.<\/p>\n The latest examples cover writers and politicians just after WWII.<\/p>\n I find it\u00a0a real pleasure to immerse myself in these passages to see how they work and then find a name to attach to them.<\/p>\n Because, says Farnsworth, “Today’s politician tends to be a creature of very modest literacy and wit.”<\/p>\n Skillful use of rhetoric requires moderation. And it works best to convey significant ideas.<\/p>\n Today’s leaders tend to lack any restraint, he notes, and use rhetorical devices to convey trivial information.<\/p>\n Their abuse has given rhetoric as a whole a bad name.<\/p>\n But don’t throw out the entire field just because some people abuse it.<\/p>\n If you want to learn more about rhetoric in a quick and easy way, this book is an excellent way to start.<\/p>\n And for more discussion of this book, see my longer review<\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n Here’s a passage worth pondering from writer G. K. Chesterton:<\/strong><\/p>\n An inconvenience is only an adventure wrongly considered;<\/h2>\n
Don’t believe me?<\/h3>\n
So break the rule in your titles<\/h3>\n
\n<\/a><\/h2>\n
Fresh content: 5 reasons why writers should learn about rhetoric<\/h2>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\nWhat I’m reading: Farnsworth’s Classical English Rhetoric<\/em><\/h2>\n
\n\u2022\u00a0Structural matters
\n\u2022\u00a0Dramatic devices<\/p>\nWhy not use contemporary examples?<\/h3>\n
\nSeptember Book Giveaway: Name that device!<\/h2>\n
\nan adventure is an inconvenience rightly considered.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n