{"id":704,"date":"2014-06-09T18:46:21","date_gmt":"2014-06-09T18:46:21","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thatwhitepaperguy.com\/?p=704"},"modified":"2021-02-01T11:47:45","modified_gmt":"2021-02-01T16:47:45","slug":"footnotes-or-endnotes","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thatwhitepaperguy.com\/footnotes-or-endnotes\/","title":{"rendered":"Footnotes or endnotes in a white paper?"},"content":{"rendered":"
You have three possible ways to provide a source in a white paper:<\/p>\n
Naturally, each approach has its own strengths and drawbacks, as summed up in the table below.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n\n
Type<\/th> | Pros<\/th> | Cons<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n |
---|---|---|
Footnotes<\/td> | Give a more academic look and highlight your research<\/td> | Interrupt the flow by directing your eyes away from the text<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
Endnotes<\/td> | Don't distract readers<\/td> | Bury your research at the end where few readers see it<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n |
In-text citations<\/td> | Don't distract readers since sources are integrated with the text like in a magazine story<\/td> | Add extra words and can sound clumsy or forced if not done expertly<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n <\/p>\n So which format do you use when?<\/h3>\nHere are my recommendations:<\/p>\n Use footnotes<\/strong>\u00a0if you have strong research from sources you want to highlight and an audience used to somewhat more formal white papers.<\/p>\n Use endnotes\u00a0<\/strong>if you have weaker sources or so many that you don’t want to distract readers from the flow of your argument.<\/p>\n Use in-text citations<\/strong>\u00a0if you have only a few sources and don’t think your readers want to look at references.<\/p>\n What if you just can’t decide? In that case, choose the least intrusive approach:\u00a0endnotes.<\/strong><\/p>\n In a white paper, most footnotes give the source for a quote, fact, or number in the text.<\/p>\n You seldom see running commentary on the text, as in a textbook or academic journal.<\/p>\n Footnotes work well in the most research-based flavor of white paper, the problem\/solution.<\/p>\n They’re somewhat useful for a backgrounder with any endorsements from third parties about the benefits of the offering being discussed.<\/p>\n But footnotes are not at all useful for a numbered list, where the emphasis is on provocative ideas, not scholarship.<\/p>\n Since endnotes are gathered together at the end of a white paper, they’re much less evident than bottom-of-the-page footnotes.<\/p>\n Because endnotes are less intrusive, they also hide away much of the research that went into a white paper.<\/p>\n Few readers ever look at the last page of a white paper to check a reference.<\/p>\n But endnotes can be useful for a white paper:<\/p>\n And whenever it’s a tossup between different approaches, I suggest endnotes.<\/p>\n You can let Word place all your endnotes on the very last page of your white paper, under a major heading like “References” or “Sources.”<\/p>\n Tip<\/strong>: Yes, you can get rid of that annoying thick bar that Word inserts at the top of your endnotes. Here’s how:<\/p>\n Presto! One less annoying rule getting in your way.<\/p>\n Magazines and newspapers don’t use footnotes. Every quote and statistic is sourced with an in-text reference, something like this…<\/p>\n “Footnotes and endnotes are soooo old-fashioned,” declared copywriter Ima Writer in her April 2013 column in\u00a0White Papers Today<\/em>. “All the cool kids today are using in-text citations.”<\/p>\n See how smooth this can be?<\/p>\n For more examples, you can pick up any magazine to see just how journalists do it.<\/p>\n The nice thing about in-text citations is they’re so tidy.<\/p>\n You don’t have to look anywhere else on the page or in the document. The whole reference is in one spot.<\/p>\n The only downside is that these citations add more words. And if you’re not careful, they can lead to some clunky-sounding sentences.<\/p>\n But in-text citations can deliver the best of both worlds.<\/p>\n Like a footnote, the whole reference is on the same page\u2014but like an endnote, it doesn’t disrupt your reading experience.<\/p>\n This approach may be better for a backgrounder or numbered list, where you’re not trying to showcase your research.<\/p>\n In a problem\/solution flavor, you may still prefer to use footnotes to highlight all the research that went into your white paper.<\/p>\n This article is a brief excerpt from\u00a0White Papers for Dummies<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0by Gordon Graham.<\/em><\/p>\n With dozens of tips and best practices for planning, producing, and promoting effective white papers,\u00a0White Papers for Dummies<\/strong><\/a>\u00a0is the most comprehensive guide to white papers ever published.<\/em><\/p>\n <\/a> |