{"id":713,"date":"2021-04-09T12:01:58","date_gmt":"2021-04-09T16:01:58","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/thatwhitepaperguy.com\/?p=713"},"modified":"2021-04-11T08:59:44","modified_gmt":"2021-04-11T12:59:44","slug":"tips-on-white-paper-sources","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/thatwhitepaperguy.com\/tips-on-white-paper-sources\/","title":{"rendered":"Tips on white paper sources"},"content":{"rendered":"
Doing research to turn up the right nuggets of proof gives your white paper more authority.<\/strong><\/p>\n Strong evidence strengthens your claims and proves that your white paper is more than one vendor\u2019s opinion.<\/p>\n Every persuasive white paper contains strong proof for any claims.<\/p>\n Throughout your research, my advice is to think like a lawyer… but not some polite lawyer in a tailored suit in an air-conditioned office.<\/p>\n No, you have to think like a mad-dog, street-fighting mongrel with red eyes and sharp teeth and absolutely no interest in a win-win.<\/p>\n As you assemble your sources, always picture the other side’s lawyer trying to chew up your evidence and spit it out.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n When you think like a lawyer, you want to build a case so tight that no judge can question it and no jury can resist it.<\/p>\n You need an argument so tight it leaves the other side gasping for air.<\/p>\n And that means:<\/p>\n That can mean getting out from behind your desk and hiking over to the nearest city or college library. There, you can consult a reference librarian to access tough-to-find journal articles or locate a relevant association to contact for an expert witness.<\/p>\n (Finished your white paper? Now send your client your list of sources<\/a>.)<\/em><\/p>\n <\/p>\n You may think you can use any source under the sun in any white paper.<\/p>\n But some sources are far better than others: more credible, more authoritative, and more persuasive.<\/p>\n The following table lists many sources you could draw on for a white paper\u2014from analysts to Wikipedia\u2014along with some brief notes on each source.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n\n <\/p>\n Of course, this table is only a guideline. Make sure to evaluate every source carefully using my TARP method<\/a>.<\/p>\n With experience, you will know when you come across a piece of solid evidence to help make your case.<\/p>\n <\/p>\n <\/a><\/p>\nThink like a lawyer<\/h3>\n
Building an open-and-shut case<\/h3>\n
\n
Where to find sources for a white paper<\/h3>\n
\n\n
\n\t Source<\/strong><\/th> Acceptable?<\/strong><\/th> Notes<\/strong><\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n\n \n\t Analysts<\/td> Yes<\/td> As long as they're credible<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Associations<\/td> Yes<\/td> As long as they\u2019re credible and established<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Blogs<\/td> Sometimes<\/td> As long as they're credible<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Books<\/td> Yes<\/td> Best to use classics in the field or titles published after 2000<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Consultants<\/td> Sometimes<\/td> Make sure they\u2019re impartial<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Forums<\/td> No<\/td> No credibility, usually anonymous<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Go-to experts\t\t<\/td> Usually<\/td> Make sure they\u2019re impartial<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Government reports<\/td> Yes<\/td> Usually have authority<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Industry reports<\/td> Usually<\/td> Make sure they\u2019re factual<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Magazines<\/td> Yes<\/td> Best published in the last five years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Newspapers<\/td> Sometimes<\/td> Stick to well-known papers, best published in the last two to three years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Professors<\/td> Yes<\/td> Usually have authority<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Sources inside the company<\/td> Yes for research, No for quotes<\/td> Good for background, but don\u2019t quote them directly: they are clearly biased<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Trade magazines<\/td> Yes<\/td> Best published in the last five years<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Websites<\/td> Sometimes<\/td> Make sure they're credible<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t White papers from other organizations<\/td> Yes<\/td> The more recognized the source, the better<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t White papers from other vendors<\/td> Sometimes<\/td> \tThe more recognized the vendor, the better; but do not send prospects to your competition<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t White papers from the same company<\/td> No<\/td> Not convincing, and could create a circular argument<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n \n\t Wikipedia<\/td> No<\/td> Wikipedia is a secondary source; use it to find primary sources<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n\n
\n